IMCA Supporters
Adroit Internet Solutions develop and host the IMCA web site




IMCA Germany
February 2002

Rule 6.3.i says, that catamarans and multihulls are forbidden. This rule is most important, because it defines the class as a class of monohull dinghis. Rule 3.ii and iii were made to prevent the scows from degenerating to a catamaran, but as we proposed within the rule change submission to the AGM 2001 these antiquated rules should be deleted, because the measurer should decide, whether he sees a multihull or not.

Since the last decades we saw a lot of designs, which were very close to the rule limits, but which were tolerated and survived or died with the advance of the class. Examples: Scows with exact 75 mm hollow, anti-nose-diving foils in front of 2700 mm, spoilers/flares with exact 75 mm hollow, sealed tubes of 90 mm diameter and anti-capsizing bags in the trampolines ...

Now we have the question, whether a Moth on foils is permitted or not. The question on an upper level is, wheter it is a multihull or not. I feel, that it is not a multihull, because it has no static stability as a multihull has. Because of that static stability a Moth with anti-capsizing bags is more a multihull than a moth on foils. So foils should be permitted, but there should be an addition to the rules, that if foils are used, they should be used in all conditions during a race series!

We have a lot of subdivisions in the Moth class as: Seniors - Juniors - Ladies, Skiffs - Old Boats - Scows. Why shouldn't we have a subdivision "Foilers"?

The German class association has read this IMCA Germany interpretation and agrees to it.

Greetings from Germany